Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: More than half of contested marriage contracts are overturned.

  1. #11
    Senior Member pbisque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    A midwest state in Murica
    Posts
    1,985
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    39
    Contract enforcement is one of the pillars of western civilization. Now that that pillar has been destroyed, at least in the case of marriage, it is all just a matter of time.

    It reminds me of a feminist single mom I used to know. She had the most equal 50 50 custody agreement with her ex that I had ever seen. She posted on FB that she was looking for recommendations for a free lawyer so she could take the case back to court and get a "more fare" agreement. That was a number of years ago and one of the moments that absolutely crystallized in my mind how feminism was complete bullshit.

    They want equality of outcome, not opportunity. To them it shouldn't matter how dumb or ill conceived your life's plan is, you should get the same results as smart and hard working people.
    I used to think collapse was inevitable. Now I realize it is necessary.

    It was only a matter of time before the bicycles realized that they in fact did not need the fish.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by pbisque View Post
    Contract enforcement is one of the pillars of western civilization. Now that that pillar has been destroyed, at least in the case of marriage, it is all just a matter of time.

    It reminds me of a feminist single mom I used to know. She had the most equal 50 50 custody agreement with her ex that I had ever seen. She posted on FB that she was looking for recommendations for a free lawyer so she could take the case back to court and get a "more fare" agreement. That was a number of years ago and one of the moments that absolutely crystallized in my mind how feminism was complete bullshit.

    They want equality of outcome, not opportunity. To them it shouldn't matter how dumb or ill conceived your life's plan is, you should get the same results as smart and hard working people.
    Following the story you mention in the first paragraphs.... I would make a point that the whole "equality of outcome" is a farce.... they want inequality of outcome, they get all and the man gets nothing.

    For feminism "equality" means: They get all the opportunities and all the outcomes.

  3. #13
    Senior Member pbisque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    A midwest state in Murica
    Posts
    1,985
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by simpleman View Post
    Following the story you mention in the first paragraphs.... I would make a point that the whole "equality of outcome" is a farce.... they want inequality of outcome, they get all and the man gets nothing.

    For feminism "equality" means: They get all the opportunities and all the outcomes.
    I think you are arguing a distinction without a difference. Equality of outcome is the definition of inequality because it doesn't take input energy into account. SJWs want to sit in a coffee shop all day with a sketch pad creating "art" but they want the lifestyle of the 90 hour a week entrepreneur that sacrifices everything to create things that people actually want. Equality of outcome is the definition of socialism and if it is implemented the productive will simply take themselves off-line.
    I used to think collapse was inevitable. Now I realize it is necessary.

    It was only a matter of time before the bicycles realized that they in fact did not need the fish.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by pbisque View Post
    I think you are arguing a distinction without a difference. Equality of outcome is the definition of inequality because it doesn't take input energy into account. SJWs want to sit in a coffee shop all day with a sketch pad creating "art" but they want the lifestyle of the 90 hour a week entrepreneur that sacrifices everything to create things that people actually want. Equality of outcome is the definition of socialism and if it is implemented the productive will simply take themselves off-line.
    No... I think I am right on this...

    "but they want the lifestyle of the 90 hour a week entrepreneur that sacrifices everything to create things that people actually want."

    Yes, they want that lifestyle... but they will not be happy just to be equal on outcome to that entrepreneur... she wants her stuff to be equal than his, and then she want his stuff too... she wants it all and he will be dead or a homeless guy under a bridge...

    When she wants that lifestyle of the successful man, she marries one... then she got there without having to put the work for it... when she wants all and let the man with nothing then the divorce comes in place...

    Your example is clear, you say it was an almost perfect 50/50... equality of outcome... archived. But then she wants more... she wants all... equality of outcome was not good enough for her...

  5. #15
    To fully understand all the marriage/divorce thing, you need to start with the basics. For unknown thousands of years, societies have had some version of marriage, or another.

    In every case, from Day 1, the purpose of those marriage laws has been to transfer the results of male effort and work to dearies. So, of course, pre-nups are going to be torn up. They violate the whole purpose of marriage laws, which are to transfer your lifetime income as rapidly and efficiently as possible to a dearie.

    Which reminds me, before I retired 20 years ago, I was talking to a woman, and used the term dearies. She got on her ear, and shouted at me that the word was sexist and offensive and insulting. I told her I was glad to hear that, I had been worried that I was losing my communication skills.

  6. #16
    I'm in love with the local pubs landlady, Celtic statuesque beauty with flaming red hair, she makes a wool sweater and riding boots look obscene. she tops off a pint of guiness with a drawing of a shamrock on top.......I guess I just needed to find the right one.























    ya right, i like my Thai girls..........they speak better english
    A man can gain no more respect than by, laying down his life for a woman. And a woman, no more than by, beating down a man. For a man to ask, what is fair and good and true and just, is to offend.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by menrppl2 View Post
    ya right, i like my Thai girls..........they speak better english
    How many times have you been to Thailand? A few years ago I had the mojo but not the money; now I have the money but not the mojo. Hell, I can't even be bothered to go to Montreal anymore.
    Men stay single and your pockets will jingle!

  8. #18
    went once for four months...luved it

    but ya no matter how ya slice it......women just aren't worth it.


    so britian seems every bit as feminist socialist politically correct as Canada, and the men as pathetic. part I was in I thought traditionalism was stronger than here tho. Canada still gets the anal Nazi award for a guy having a smoke tho. plus pearson customs has a long line up to do your declaration, twice! once by hand then digitally(once again leading the world in stupidity).Got yelled at three times for having a smoke afterwards outside(a few Asian tourists lit up anyway, probably niave to the ways of the freest country in the world). Iceland had an in airport smoking area, Scotland a shelter outside, and England ppl ignore the signs and no one seems bothered.


    seen a funny tshirt

    women need four animals
    a mink for there back
    a jaguar for the drive
    a tiger for the bed
    and a jackass to pay for it all

    since audiences are as hard in the north as on avfm, try this three times fast...

    Im not a pheasant plucker or a pheasant pluckers mate
    But, Ill pluck pheasants because the pheasant pluckers late.

    and thus concludes my European tour for mens rights.
    Last edited by menrppl2; 11-02-2017 at 09:05 AM.
    A man can gain no more respect than by, laying down his life for a woman. And a woman, no more than by, beating down a man. For a man to ask, what is fair and good and true and just, is to offend.

  9. #19
    Despite the stated purpose of pre-nups, you're better off regarding them as a ploy to lull you into a false sense of security.

  10. #20
    That is exactly correct. Or, I might view it as an attorney wishing to get paid to write one for you, well knowing it will be overturned by the court, and the attorney will get paid for an impossible attempt to uphold it. Lawyers will tell you if a pre-nup is properly written it will be upheld. What they don't tell you is properly written means written so she gets everything.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •