There is one detail in one of the facts I wrote which nails the fast movement. No one really wants to think about it, just start disputing what I wrote because it contradicts the 'wisdom' memorized by consensus science.

That detail is the plant material, not decomposed in the mammoths. Too many academics are specialists, who cannot function outside their specialty. (Not to mention how well they do inside it.)

When I first read about those frozen mammoths, many decades ago, they talked to refrigeration experts, who told them for a creature that large to have non-decomposed plant material in their tracts, they had to be snap frozen in a few minutes. In a creature that large, weighing many hundreds of pounds, the body heat would be such that simply dying while cold weather blew in, taking several hours, could not cool that creature fast enough to prevent total decomposing of the plant material. It takes a long time to cool down that much flesh. And, the digestive acids will work even when the creature is dead, as long as the body is warm.

So, the body clearly went from warm, sunny day to a tremendous temperature far below zero in a few minutes. You say there may be other explanations. Well, share them with us. How to freeze a multi-ton creature in a few minutes without moving it elsewhere. Don't just keep saying there may be other explanations. Give us realistic example of other explanations. Just remember any other explanation has to include keeping it frozen well below zero for an unknown number of thousands of years. 20 degrees C. to -50 C in a few minutes, then stays cold for thousands of years. Those mammoths were in a warm, grassy field one minute, then moved in a few minutes to an extremely cold environment and stayed there for thousands of years. That has to be one hummer of an explanation for someone trying to prove the surface did not move much nor fast.

It also does not explain away the fact that two specific locations on the earth both moved a long ways. Siberia from temperate weather to Arctic, and Minnesota from Arctic to temperate. At the same time, and holding that cold temperature.

And, the magnetic particles changing bearing. No, it is just standard defending traditional beliefs, not scientific refutation.

So, how did the animals get frozen that fast? It took Bob and me a full month to figure that out. We could not simply state it didn't matter, with vague and imaginary alternative explanations. Neither Bob nor I would tolerate that sort of nonsense.

To understand this, you need to see time lapse photos of a ball, of any type, when it is hit, with a tennis racket or baseball bat, or ?. It goes way out of round.

When the large object hit earth, hard enough to move the surface of the earth a thousand miles or more, the earth went out of round. There is only one place close enough to a warm, sunny grassy field with large creatures grazing in it, fast enough to snap freeze it. And, that is UP!

Mt. Everest, which seems to be a new mountain, not an old one, is only 5 miles, and it is pretty cold up there, but not cold enough to snap freeze a mammoth. However, a slam hard enough to move the surface of the earth a long ways can certainly drive it out of round a great altitude. I believe it gets colder as you go up, but at an extreme altitude it gets hot.

Once it goes up, the entire planet is going to be in motion. The out of round, hit by an object moving 20,000 miles an hour, went up fast, but it will work its way down much more slowly. And, when it stops, it is in the Arctic zone, and stays there for thousands of years until the next strike. And, my hills, now at 5,740 feet and more, are forcibly dragged out of the ocean and raised way up. Not that I am saying this was the only major strike; evidence is there have been many of them. My hills may have been dragged out a long time ago. We would need more data to date the movement that dragged my hills out of the ocean.

When those two stated places moved a great distance, that also meant the entire Polar snow and ice load was moved. Well out into the temperate zone. The first summer, that snow load will start to melt, and the entire earth will be laden with very high humidity, and rain. (Thus The Flood, which is allegedly in the ancestral history of peoples all over the planet.) This will continue until large quantities of precipitation move into the new dark and cold zone, now known as the Arctic region.

Oh, but wait a minute. It was already summer in that hemisphere, wasn't it?

And, also the Grand Canyon. It was not made by the slow erosion of a small river over a zillion years. I am going to repeat, it is not possible for a small river over time to make what the Grand Canyon has become. There are many channels cut across there. It might be possible for a small river to cut a single channel a mile deep, although a couple miles wide stretches the imagination. But, then how do you get the river back up to cut out the next mile deep channel? As I said, it is not possible. Try to make an algorithm to explain the complex patterns in the Grand Canyon, and it won't be long before you realize you can't do it.

How can the entire science program of the world fail to see the obvious violent changes in the earth's surface? Ph. D's are not my favorite people. To become a Ph.D. you must accept without question the entire field you are working in, without the slightest disagreement. Any disagreement and your career is toast. And, after you get it, any disagreement subjects you to extreme bullying of every type.

So, you have a lot of people who buy into tectonics and they are all trained that the earth moves an inch a year or some trivial amount. They are so indoctrinated to conventional ignorance that they are incapable of accepting anything dramatically different. And, if someone does figure it out, and says so, his funds stop and his career is toast.

In my negative view of Ph.D.'s I do not totally exempt my eldest son.

The first medical paper on low carb was written in 1802, though I have not been able to get it. I do have the one written around 1865, and the books on the topic written in 1972, Also, Guyton & Hall, the physiology text book used in both USA and Mexico in many medical schools describe what is essentially Atkins Diet in excruciating detail. Yet, most doctors, hit by the same consensus science that messes up Ph.D minds are still preaching the need for lots of carbs, even as the health of both nations evaporates.

Comment about my user name. When I introduced myself, I said that name was a goal, not a promise, that I have no intention of wearing concentric circles on my chest while people beat up on me. There are some pretty snarky comments on this board.