Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

more men named John run companies than all some women

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • more men named John run companies than all some women

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...en-altogether/

    This story was covered by Feministing and posted to by a female Facebook friend.

    The whole premise of the article is ridiculous. More men start companies so more men run companies. For many men it's their dream, also for some women. Many women wish to marry a rich business man and live a life of leisure. Is there a graph for that?

    The woman who posted this does not work at the moment and her husband is called John. If he became a CEO would she be glad of the extra income made available to her or think he worked for a sexist company?!
    Last edited by Petros; 03-07-2015, 07:31 AM.

  • #2
    There are more men on corporate boards named John, Robert, William or James than there are women on boards altogether
    And there are more women who constantly whine about things named Mary, Elizabeth, Sarah or Susan than all men on the planet who whine combined.
    “No one is free who has not obtained the empire of himself. No man is free who cannot command himself.”
    ― Pythagoras

    Comment


    • #3
      there are also more men named John who are homeless and destitute than all the homeless women combined, when are we going to talk about fixing the gender gap within the street people population?

      if they were really interested in gender equality rather than gender supremacy you'd think that side of the issue would be just as important?
      I don't expect any feminist to be interested in actually helping men out of poverty of course but we could at least work on increasing the number of homeless women to compensate. the current method of encouraging them to enter useless fields like liberal arts or gender studies are simply not doing enough to close this gap, mostly because of feminist efforts to ensure job quotas. it seems clear then that we shall have to institute a similar sort of quota on poverty, a certain number of women chosen at random will need to be forced to sleep on the street and eat from dumpsters, a desperate measure sure but it is a necessary one if we are ever to have any sort of true equality.
      "It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal." - Aristotle

      Comment


      • #4
        yet more proof that the western world is Jhonist.
        or this could just be bull shit
        Just some melancholy cat

        Comment

        Working...
        X