Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Diversity officer could be sacked after tweeting 'Kill All White Men' Petition!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by willow View Post
    In my defense do remember I'm a european who is essentially reading up on the internal history of a foreign country.
    You already know more than most Americans from the Public Urban Re-education Camps.
    Last edited by JohnDoe; 05-26-2015, 06:08 PM.

    Comment


    • #17
      If you consider pro-slavery conservative.
      The South was solidly Dem. They were loudly, and unapologetically pro-slavery. Even then, they were the party of the elite, as slave owners were about 10% of the population. The wealthiest 10%. The Southern media was just as poisonous and dishonest as our current one. A small, rich elite, that serves only itself, at the expense of the rest. Just like the dems today.
      The dems were the party of slavery. The party of civil war. The party of the KKK. The party of Jim Crow. The party of racism and segregation. It was Bull Connor and other dems attacking blacks who dared protest. A higher percentage of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than dems. It was a dem Supreme Court that decided blacks were property, not people, but still counted as 3/5 of a person. Giving the South additional representation without any benefit to blacks. The same Supreme Court whose decision said, "blacks have no rights that the white man is compelled to recognize"
      The dems are just as evil today, on every issue. Now its just a different group that gets marginalized and dehumanized. They have already flooded the country with illegals, who will vote, fraudulently, but blatantly, in broad daylight, by the busload in 2016. Watch it happen.

      Comment


      • #18
        if you're comparing it from overseas it gets a little wonky because our parties are inverted... different traditions being conservated.

        but yeah slavery, segregation, Jim Crow, socialism and communism... feminism.

        it all comes from the same place really, the Ideology that people are and/or should be the property of their governments rather than that governments belong to the people. even the "progressive" social policies which might seem like a good idea exist because the government has a duty to look after it's property(you) rather than you having any obligation or expectation of being able to look after yourself.
        in fact the Idea that people might look after themselves is abhorrent and they do everything they can to limit or prevent peoples ability to do so, criminalizing it whenever they can.
        Last edited by Jack H.; 05-26-2015, 07:26 PM.
        "It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal." - Aristotle

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Crumbock View Post
          If you consider pro-slavery conservative.
          The South was solidly Dem. They were loudly, and unapologetically pro-slavery. Even then, they were the party of the elite, as slave owners were about 10% of the population. The wealthiest 10%. The Southern media was just as poisonous and dishonest as our current one. A small, rich elite, that serves only itself, at the expense of the rest. Just like the dems today.
          The dems were the party of slavery. The party of civil war. The party of the KKK. The party of Jim Crow. The party of racism and segregation. It was Bull Connor and other dems attacking blacks who dared protest. A higher percentage of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than dems. It was a dem Supreme Court that decided blacks were property, not people, but still counted as 3/5 of a person. Giving the South additional representation without any benefit to blacks. The same Supreme Court whose decision said, "blacks have no rights that the white man is compelled to recognize"
          The dems are just as evil today, on every issue. Now its just a different group that gets marginalized and dehumanized. They have already flooded the country with illegals, who will vote, fraudulently, but blatantly, in broad daylight, by the busload in 2016. Watch it happen.
          If you actually studied American History and read primary source documentation half of what you said would be correct, but it isn't. The Republican Party, under Abraham Lincoln, pushed for war because of tariffs. Read Lincoln's First Inaugural Address where he states that there was a 13th Amendment (Google Corwin Amendment) that was pending ratification that would have allowed slave holding states to remain slave holding states and the federal/northern state governments would back off. The reason why he was in favor of the Corwin Amendment was because he wrote the damn thing. He iterated that his only intention to go to war was over the Morrel Tariff that would have pushed tariff rates in the south to 49%.

          On the day of the defense of Charleston Harbor, there were four US Navy vessels carrying several infantry regiments, supplies, and ammunition to reinforce Fort Sumter. If they were unable to reinforce Fort Sumter, they were ordered to seize Charleston Harbor for the US federal government. The only reason why General Beauregard ordered the coastal batteries to open fire was to drive off the naval fleet that had entered the harbor at roughly 4 AM. Prior to these events in April of 1861, Major Anderson, commander of Fort Moultrie on one of the islands in Charleston Harbor forced marched his troops to capture local fishing boats to move his forces from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter on December 25, 1860. His movement after South Carolina seceded was a de facto declaration of war through invasion under International Law at the time.

          Now to correct more mistakes, it was the Republicans that failed to free any slaves in northern held states. Read the Emancipation Proclamation, the slaves that were freed were in areas no longer under control or authority of the US government. Maryland, a slave holding state inside of the Union, kept all their slaves as did those in areas under US government control. It's right there in black and white. You should read the exchange of letters between Lincoln and a commanding general in Missouri that wanted to free all slaves there. Lincoln countermanded that order and this was in 1861. The issue of slavery didn't come to prominence until the 1864 election and Lincoln had to account for all the deaths of Union and Confederate soldiers as well as the actions of the Union soldiers in the south like the massive looting, raping of women, and destruction of property like food. It's ironic that the Statue of Freedom on the Capitol Building in Washington D.C. was raised by Maryland slaves in 1863.

          In the state of Missouri, state courts freed Dredd Scott and it was the Republican/Whig US Supreme Court that put him back into bondage.

          FYI, Jim Crow laws existed in the north since 1787 and it was the US federal government that held the southern states under martial law and military dictatorships that brought it south. The individual state legislatures were ignored and if they tried to govern as they were required to under their state constitution(s), the US Army had orders to shoot any agitator on sight due to the soldiers being stationed inside of the legislative and other government offices. Thus, southern resistance to Jim Crow laws was nullified under the threat of violence.

          Now according to primary source documentation, primarily the correspondence of Confederate General Bedford Forrest that it was a peaceful organization and he ordered its disbandment when he received word that many of the groups had been compromised by Radical Republicans to terrorize the southern population regardless of skin color. That was the first KKK.

          Now, this is not a defense of slavery or the actions that were taken against blacks during the Reconstruction Era. However, one must understand that the US federal government gave blacks the right to vote while stripped whites of their rights at the same time. The rights that were stripped were the ability to run for office, the ability to vote, etc... Due to this every single southern state that was under occupation had their treasuries emptied by Radical Republicans that were voted into office by new black voters and southern whites had no way of stopping it. These states during and after Reconstruction were bankrupted and forced to bear the costs of the war. However, because of the severe devastation to the south it would take anywhere between 50-150 years to recover from the war.

          My final word on this is do not believe in the fairy tales that were passed on.
          https://christianrestoration.wordpress.com/

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Jack H. View Post
            it all comes from the same place really, the Ideology that people are and/or should be the property of their governments rather than that governments belong to the people.
            This same mentality unfortunately pervades our corporations as well.


            A Mr. E-ism: Corporations exist for the purposes of people, not the other way around.
            FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
            It's time to call it out for what it is.
            == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


            The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
            http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

            Comment


            • #21
              I've been following this story since the petition to remove Ms. Mustafa went up so I thought I'd post an update. Over 23,000 people have sign the petition was present to the university and they refused to do anything about it. It seems as though Andy Keene, the chap who started the petition is still trying to get the police to do something about Mustafa. Something about what she did being a violation of an anti hate speech law.

              https://www.change.org/p/expel-bahar...hs-university?

              I'm upset about this. I see nothing being done about this woman and this hate movement she's a part of and I feel so fucking powerless.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Silverblade View Post
                I've been following this story since the petition to remove Ms. Mustafa went up so I thought I'd post an update. Over 23,000 people have sign the petition was present to the university and they refused to do anything about it. It seems as though Andy Keene, the chap who started the petition is still trying to get the police to do something about Mustafa. Something about what she did being a violation of an anti hate speech law.

                https://www.change.org/p/expel-bahar...hs-university?

                I'm upset about this. I see nothing being done about this woman and this hate movement she's a part of and I feel so fucking powerless.
                Fighting bullying with bullying? Hmmmm.

                I'm not sure I support the idea of 'signing petitions' or coming up with #hashtags to hound certain people out of certain elected (or indeed fairly earned/deserved) positions simply because we don't agree with something they say or do.

                Isn't that what we always call out feminists for doing?
                Last edited by Maxx; 06-04-2015, 11:28 AM.
                "Being a cunt doesn't make you wrong." ComradePrescott

                Comment


                • #23
                  How about we return to when "free speech" meant "free speech." Not "free speech unless we choose to take it away from you."

                  I don't care what she said. How about responding with "kill all colored women?"

                  Oh, that's right the meN word. Men are twelfth-class semi-citizens in the West.

                  I dunno about you all, but there are many places in the world where having a penis is not criminalized. I look around for alternatives, actively. sovereignman.com is one place.

                  But batting ideas back and forth while the foundations of your society are being dug from beneath you? Do you really think that the USA/wherever is too big to fail?

                  Good luck with that.
                  Last edited by JohnDoe; 06-05-2015, 01:56 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Can I also point out that 'white' people were not the only users of slaves (as this has been discussed above). The Barbary Pirates used to make free men and women slaves for centuries. They were quite capable of taking English people from Southern England as well. Even Icelanders from the North Atlantic! These so-called Corsairs were, finally, suppressed and broken by the Yanks, Brits and the French. Indeed, a Brit Admiral (Pellew (yes, of TV's 'Hornblower' series)) attacked their home base mercilessly. Revenge for the capture and enslavement of a Cornish family ancestor, perhaps. He freed thousands of white, Christian slaves from the Ottoman Turk Corsairs.

                    I understand Miss Mustafa comes from a Turkish Cypriot family. Presumably, she understands that her nation were still taking part in clandestine slavery into the 20th Century (the favoured 'black' slaves). Presumably, she knows that her nation were happy to make slaves of any race.

                    Perhaps she recalls that her nation invaded another in 1974, expelling many of the unwanted white Christian inhabitants. Patterns. I always see patterns.

                    Oh and let's not forget the genocide of the Armenians (the descendants of the 1st Christian State on the planet), Assyrians and Greeks in Ottoman Turkey:

                    "The total number of people killed as a result has been estimated at between 800,000 to 1.5 million. The starting date is conventionally held to be 24 April 1915, the day Ottoman authorities rounded up and arrested, subsequently executing, some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople".

                    Turkey downplayed the 100th anniversary just a few weeks ago...

                    "In 2007, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) reached a consensus that "the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian Greeks".

                    She can look down her nose at other races but her own ancestral society is hardly a glowing 'diversity' role model. Is this where her behaviour has its seed? After all, "KillAllWhiteMen" now sounds very familiar...


                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates
                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
                    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/thea-h...b_7338934.html
                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_genocide
                    Last edited by Sigma; 06-05-2015, 08:12 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Silverblade View Post
                      I'm upset about this. I see nothing being done about this woman and this hate movement she's a part of and I feel so fucking powerless.

                      Not much sense in getting upset about things you can't change. It seems all you can do it roll with the punches and steer clear of crazy western women and the massive shitstorms they can cause you. Their bullshit simply isn't worth it anymore. Western governments are pandering to feminists and it's pretty hard to fight the system. I'll vote with my dollars and my feet, making my money in Canada and spending it in other countries where a man can have his fun without worrying about false rape allegations and all of western women's other shit. Once in a while I'll GoPro in Canada, happy with the knowledge that the cash I pay won't get taxed and is therefore somewhat removed from supporting a system which works against us.
                      Stay single and prosper!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X