Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Robots objectify women?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Manalysis View Post
    Double fucking standards.

    M
    haha yeah M
    Originally posted by MatrixTransform
    where were you before you put yourself last?
    Originally posted by TheNarrator
    Everywhere I travel, tiny life. Single-serving sugar, single-serving cream, single pat of butter. The microwave Cordon Bleu hobby kit. Shampoo-conditioner combos, sample-packaged mouthwash, tiny bars of soap. The people I meet on each flight? They're single-serving friends.

    Comment


    • #32
      The early 20th century was marked by a great conflict between two ideas, Capitalism and Communism, which competed for hearts and minds.

      Both sides tried to convince the people that they could provide a better standard of living.

      Both sides realized that women could be harnessed for their productive capacity as workers.

      But most men were content to provide for their wives.

      So they created no-fault divorce so that any stupid reason could be used to seperate a woman and require her to get a job to support herself.

      In addition they declared that a couple's assets would simply be divided in half.

      This created a new "checkbox" on a man's list when looking for a suitable mate : "She must have a job to cover her half of the loss."

      Along with that, many courts would "impute" a woman's income based on her education.

      So it became important for girls who wanted to marry to have a college degree.

      They used to call it "Getting your MRS degree."

      So a good job and a college degree became "must haves" for any girl who wanted to marry, because these INDEMNIFY her spouse from divorce.

      Are you following me?

      Ifyou have a good job, and your wife is a home-maker with no degree, court gives her half, all of that money is what YOU made, and any support will be based on the fact she has no education to support herself.

      If you have a good job, your wife has a good job and a degree, court gives her half, most of that money is what SHE made, and any support is based on the fact she is educated and qualified to support herself.

      And so having a good job is part of a girl's SMV, having a degree is part of her SMV.

      Because that indemnifies you from getting butt-raped in court.

      This is why the govt is forever trying to get women's wages higher, because it's linked to marriage rates.

      "But why don't they just get rid of no fault divorce or make divorce more fair?"

      Because most women would go back to being housewives.

      There would be a "labor shortage" or more accurately we couldn't support rampant consumerism.

      The US economy would unravel and look like Brazil.

      Most people here consider society "gynocentric."

      I consider it "psychopath-androcentric."

      In other words, it's not for "nice guys" who want to fall in love and be with someone forever.

      It's for psychopathic guys who know how to manipulate the system.

      Women are not the tennis rackets.

      Women are the ball.

      People like Hillary are agents of psychopathic maleness, they are obedient servants of the establishment.

      She does not represent "women."

      She's like a mama-san at a brothel who gets the girls ready to be fucked.

      "Make sure you have your abortion cards ready girls, we don't want to inconvenience the guys."

      That's "women's healthcare."

      Women's liberation is chaining them to a desk.

      Institutional Feminism is the agenda paid by the CIA and set by men in suits.

      "Grass roots" Feminism is a bunch of desperate, mentally-ill women on the internet reaching out to each other for help.

      "Sexual harassment" is what prevents women from sleeping their way to the top.

      If they didn't have sexual harassment, some pussybeggar CEO would have all women managers as his personal harem, and all the guys would just be doing gruntwork for low pay.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Beour3rd View Post
        this hits it right on the head i think
        Agreed and to take it one step further and answer why they want to deny male pleasure.....because misandry and gynocentrism. They fear loss of their ATM mules.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by StrongSilentType View Post
          Irony.

          The problem isn't that it "objectifies" women; it's that it commoditizes them.

          Women's value is rooted in objectification, which sounds bad until you look at the alternative, which is to be valued only for utility, the way men are.

          So basically you're saying that the primary concern here is "competition"?
          Last edited by mr_e; 10-27-2016, 10:27 AM.
          FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
          It's time to call it out for what it is.
          == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


          The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
          http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Iggy View Post
            Prove to me that a robot can provide consent. Hell, prove to me how a women can provide consent... legally... as consent is a state of mind. If we can't do that right now with humans why are we even thinking about worrying about AI consent.

            And none of this bypasses biology.. currently humans need other humans to make humans. Sure, I imagine artificial wombs, cloning, ect... those might eventually replace the current squishy/STD version of human reproduction.

            The trick for women will be... how will they justify theft of male resources if human reproduction is not a female-only monopoly? Right now, men pay the lions share of the world's burdens for food, transportation, housing, utilities. All that extra male motivation for courting female sexual market value... for reproductive purposes... hinges on the promise of being a dad one day. Without that motivation... well... see modern day Japan.

            Not that I am worried about that happening any time soon... human robot and medical progress will be bankrupted by the state just like everything else. The inevitable conclusion of socialism is communism.. and the inevitable conclusion of communism is mis-management of resources, apathy and starvation.

            Feminism is extremely expensive, requires state violence to enforce, and leads to more miserable women, and men of course. Its a Utopian ideology that will end up the same as all other Utopian ideologies... bankrupt or dead from eating their seed crop.

            The parasites don't care if they kill the host.. because they think there will always be another host to latch onto.

            Objectification is just another made-up socialist word for 'give me more money because of vagina or I'll have the state put you in jail'. It just a fancy replacement for the other taboo word: "discrimination", which is just another way of saying "unaccountable" or "infantile".

            Discrimination is vital.. based on people's behaviour.. because some behaviours are objectively not-preferred, and evil.

            Objectification is another way of saying something is evil, without having to define why, and without having to have direct evidence. Its just another 'state of mind' subjective term.

            Objectification... nothing objective about it... which is the ultimate irony.

            What is this bullshit about machine "consent"??

            What a fucked-up bullshit concept.

            Do we ask our CARS and TRUCKS if they "FEEL LIKE" being our beasts of burden and haul our asses around or pull stumps from our back yards or crawl through the muck and mire or any of the other bajillion uses we put them to?

            Fuck no.

            Do we ASK our Washers and Driers if they "FEEL LIKE" being "USED" to clean our clothes? You know, they never get a break, or a chance to "express themselves" or even try their hands (metaphorically-speaking) at Doing the Dishes or Dog-Washing.

            And when has any WOMAN ever asked her VIBRATOR if it "FELT LIKE" plowing her furrow or getting stuck up her shithole? And yet those very self-same women taking umbrage at the idea of "Sex Robots" have undoubtedly done just that and exactly that countless times and without a second thought towards the devaluation of their stiffy friends.

            I am sick and fucking tired over all this FEIGNED MORAL OUTRAGE by FEMINISTS over anything and everything that involves MEN.


            FUCK FEMINISM - RIGHT IN THE ASS.

            Coming soon, we'll program our ROBOTS to do it too.
            Last edited by mr_e; 10-27-2016, 10:09 AM.
            FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
            It's time to call it out for what it is.
            == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


            The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
            http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Manalysis View Post
              Oh, please ...
              No man views woman as interchangeable with robots.
              Wrt. their purpose, robots are interchangeable with any other kind of masturbation.
              Wrt. their construction, robots are probably easier to repair than women.


              What does "viewing sex as a mechanical act" even mean ...?


              Sure here are feelings involved. Always. Like horniness.

              M
              Plus robots can take way more abuse...

              (Just sayin ;-)



              [That was HUMOR, for any HUMOR-IMPAIRED INDIVIDUAL (aka FEMINIST) who might be reading this]
              FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
              It's time to call it out for what it is.
              == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


              The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
              http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by StrongSilentType View Post
                Women's value is rooted in objectification, which sounds bad until you look at the alternative, which is to be valued only for utility, the way men are.
                Thanks to feminism women in the west now have the joy of only being valued for utility too.

                Socially as a 'bump and dumps' to mid/high value males and professionally as middle management fodder for corporate American.

                And by the time most of them wise up to this reality and try to get of the cock and corporate career carousels at the same time they realize being on both as long as they have has eroded their SMV so much that they are running on fumes at this point.

                That's when they get desperate and lock their sights on a poor unsuspecting beta provider.
                "Being a cunt doesn't make you wrong." ComradePrescott

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by malcolm View Post
                  I don't even know why anyone in their right mind would claim that robots shaped like women would "objectify" women. At least they are trying to create the appearance of a whole woman. Women just use lifelike imitations of a man's penis (without the rest of the body) to get themselves off and no one has a problem with that. Have you seen some of the dildos that women use?

                  Exactly. So where's the FEMINIST MORAL OUTRAGE at OBJECTIFYING MEN for their MALE PARTS???

                  (Crickets)

                  Yup, that's what I thought.

                  All for HER, NONE for Him.

                  That's what FEMINISM is all about.
                  FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
                  It's time to call it out for what it is.
                  == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


                  The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
                  http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Deidre View Post
                    Maybe ask the manufacturers of these sex robots as to what that might mean considering that a robot would only be capable of providing a very sterile, robotic (no pun) type of sexual experience. Guess time will tell.

                    As to the OP, I don't see why feminists concern themselves with these things, tbh. Are they worried women will be replaced by sex robots? lol I think the average woman who isn't a feminist (myself included), doesn't even contemplate this.


                    Because it's not about competition, it's about the FEMINIST IMPERATIVE to *control* the MALE-- anything male, masculine or relating to men.


                    FUCK FEMINISM
                    FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
                    It's time to call it out for what it is.
                    == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


                    The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
                    http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
                      Once they figure out how to combine a vibrator with an ATM they'll have no use for men at all.



                      Laughing my ass off!! ;-)
                      FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
                      It's time to call it out for what it is.
                      == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


                      The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
                      http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Maxx View Post
                        Well D, yes and no.

                        There's no really easy way to explain this but there is a reason why feminism tends to appeal to (for want of a better word) 'ugly' women.

                        Imagine if there was an organization committed to forcing all NBA players over 6'5 to play basketball while standing in 2 ft trenches that zig-zagged the the length and width of the court.

                        You know what kinda of people would be among that organization's most ardent supporters?

                        SHORT GUYS.

                        There are a couple of KEY basic facts about biological inter-gender attraction that feminist theory runs counter to.

                        1) Women aren't created equal in terms of SMV. It isn't fair. But that's life. No one is crying a river for men too short to make it in the NBA are they?
                        2) No matter what a woman's natural SMV happens to be, it will go into terminal decline starting in her mid to late 20s.

                        Now there's a couple of additional issues here. While women CAN improve their overall SMV through personal agency to an extent they can't do so by focusing on the same aspects of themselves as a man might. For example, While a man DOES improve his SMV by being successful in a high-power/high-paying career a woman doesn't. Because at no point does any man gain access to that capital or provision by romantic association with the woman in question.

                        'But don't you want a woman you can hold a conversation with' Feminists will gripe. Here's the thing.

                        I've been with plenty of women in 'high-power' (read: middle management) careers. All they seem to want to do is bitch about theirs as if they aren't basically in the same situation every man that's ever worked a day in his life has ever been in.

                        So how does a woman improve her SMV? Beyond the obvious stuff like eating right and not being gym shy, she improves her SMV by making herself an asset to the man she wishes to build a future with. If she makes herself indispensable then she scores herself a spot. It's really that simple.

                        Only the trouble is 99% of relationship advice by women for women in media etc, just teaches them to go out of their way to be a pain in the ass. And that's a sure fire way to get yourself ditched by any man that isn't a desperate beta pussy beggar. So most women end up in a situation where the way they are trained to act and behave essentially ENSURES the only kind of man that will ever be interested in being in a relationship with these women is the last kinda man any of them actually want.

                        And that's when the government/family courts system comes in.


                        Exactly. However, I've already repped you and can't give you another right now.
                        FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
                        It's time to call it out for what it is.
                        == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


                        The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
                        http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Manalysis View Post
                          Double fucking standards.

                          M
                          Standards fucked doubled
                          FEMINISM is a HATE GROUP - Feminists are HATEFUL PEOPLE
                          It's time to call it out for what it is.
                          == REJECT FEMINISM. EMBRACE HUMANITY ==


                          The World of Men - Men's Rights / MGTOW / Sites of Interest to Men
                          http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showt...nterest-to-Men

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X