Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Feminist Hero Installed As Prime Minister Of Myanmar - Her First Major Act? Genocide!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Feminist Hero Installed As Prime Minister Of Myanmar - Her First Major Act? Genocide!


    Aung San Suu Kyi giving a speech after receiving Nobel Peace Prize back in 1990

    AUNG SAN SUU KYI a feminist activist and current prime minister of Myanmar is compared by feminists to the likes of Martin Luther King and Mahatma Ghandi (http://www.feministpress.org/books-a-m/aung-san-s). Such is her reverence in the world of feminism an ideology which promoted and celebrated her ascension to stardom and power in Myanmar.

    Western powers and feminist NGOs pressured Myanmar’s previous government to relinquish power and install this feminist as prime minister of the country April last year. The country erupted into ethnic violence two months ago when the military and police force ordered by Suu Kyi’s government set about attacking villages of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar burning their villages and driving them into bordering Bangladesh in the hundreds of thousands. The Rohingya minority are a forest dwelling people, mostly farmers that are from a different race and religion to the buddhist majority of the country to which Suu Kyi belongs.

    Embarrassed by the violence brought about by their newly installed prime minister western powers have over the past couple of months asked her to renounce the violence.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41297145

    This is a particularly weird request seeing how she herself and her government are behind this genocidal campaign. She appeared a number of times on television the past week making racist remarks towards the Rohingya minority and today for the first time she publicly made an official response to the request made by western powers for her to renounce the attacks in which she justified the attacks and the displacement of the Rohingya.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41315924

    Feminism being the female supremacist ideology that it is has long argued that women have superior cultural values to men and that the only solution to world problems is to allow women to gain control of the levers of power.

    “Everything I learn reinforces my conviction that the only corrective to social inequality, cruelty and callousness, is to be found in values which, if we cannot call them female, can be called sororal. They are the opposite of competitiveness, acquisitiveness and domination, and may be summed up by the word ‘co-operation’. In the world of the sisterhood, all deserve care and attention, including the very old, the very young, the imbecile and the outsider. The quality of daily life is what matters, the taste of the food on the table, the light in the room, the peace and wholeness of the moment. Perfect love casteth out fear. The only perfect love to be found on earth is not sexual love, which is riddled with hostility and insecurity, but the wordless commitment of families, which takes as its model mother-love. This is not to say that fathers have no place, for father-love, with its driving for self-improvement and discipline, is also essential to survival, but that uncorrected father-love as it were practised by both parents, is a way to annihilation.” Germaine Greer. Mad Woman’s Underclothes. 1994.


    Myanmarian hitting a crossed out photo of Suu Kyi with his slipper.
    Last edited by Equity; 09-19-2017, 05:36 PM.

  • #2
    Cooperate or Die... the socialist/feminist/communist (but I repeat myself) mantra.

    "Greater good" = pseudo-moral sophistry used to portray a method of self-defense in the act of killing people to achieve a Utopian vision of social order.

    Always the same. There is no greater minority than an individual. States are, by definition, counter-individual, counter property rights, counter slavery. As soon as you bring a gun to the discussion, its coercion, nothing more.

    Comment


    • #3
      I get your point, but considering what happens to religious minorities in many Muslim-dominated countries, I really don't give a shit about what happens to Muslim minorities elsewhere. Sure, it's a simplistic point of view, but hey, I'm just a simple guy.
      Stay single and prosper!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
        I get your point, but considering what happens to religious minorities in many Muslim-dominated countries, I really don't give a shit about what happens to Muslim minorities elsewhere. Sure, it's a simplistic point of view, but hey, I'm just a simple guy.
        OBE, you are plain speaking guy that I appreciate, but this is about as stupid a thing as I've ever read on this forum. When the details are plainly available you can see their religion has nothing to do with the situation. Those people people are being forced off their ancestral long standing homes and territory, because they are different and vulnerable a more powerful group in charge of the government who wants to steal what they have.

        Of all the shit you see time and time again, this is the simplest. Some bastards want to take their stuff and kill them. Take a simple view on it by all means, but try avoid the stupid one.
        "...especially when it comes to communication, it can be observed, if it is not a negotiation it's a war."
        Originally posted by menrppl2
        Can't live with em, life is great without them.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by voidspawn View Post
          OBE, you are plain speaking guy that I appreciate, but this is about as stupid a thing as I've ever read on this forum. When the details are plainly available you can see their religion has nothing to do with the situation. Those people people are being forced off their ancestral long standing homes and territory, because they are different and vulnerable a more powerful group in charge of the government who wants to steal what they have.

          Of all the shit you see time and time again, this is the simplest. Some bastards want to take their stuff and kill them. Take a simple view on it by all means, but try avoid the stupid one.
          Myanmar is 88% Buddhist, 4% Muslim(Rohingya), and Sunni Muslim at that. Seems like religion's involved to me! You think it's stupid, fine, but as I said, I don't give a flying fuck what happens to Sunni Muslims as a minority anywhere, because I just know how they'd be treating minority religions if Myanmar were 88% Sunni Muslim instead (I think we've all seen enough shining examples of Sunni Islam's tolerance of other religions to know). Don't bullshit me otherwise. If the Buddhists kick them all out of Myanmar, good for them. Call it genocide if you want, and maybe it is, but this is one person who doesn't give a fuck. More countries should kick out Sunni Muslims if you ask me. Where will they go? Don't care. Bring on the Crusades.
          Last edited by oldblueeyes; 09-19-2017, 08:01 PM.
          Stay single and prosper!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
            Myanmar is 88% Buddhist, 4% Muslim(Rohingya), and Sunni Muslim at that. Seems like religion's involved to me! You think it's stupid, fine, but as I said, I don't give a flying fuck what happens to Sunni Muslims as a minority anywhere, because I just know how they'd be treating minority religions if Myanmar were 88% Sunni Muslim instead (I think we've all seen enough shining examples of Sunni Islam's tolerance of other religions to know). Don't bullshit me otherwise. If the Buddhists kick them all out of Myanmar, good for them. Call it genocide if you want, and maybe it is, but this is one person who doesn't give a fuck. More countries should kick out Sunni Muslims if you ask me. Where will they go? Don't care. Bring on the Crusades.
            Guilt by association? I expected more from you blue.
            I sexually identify as a sword pommel, check your privilege or i will have to end you RIGHTLY.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Anonymous View Post
              Guilt by association? I expected more from you blue.
              you must not know him!
              haha


              but in all seriousness. blue has a point why is everyone outraged.. but not outraged at muslims doing the same ? i dont mean that bad deserves bad

              but.. where was all this moral outrage when muslims were doing the same?

              should the demonization not go both ways at least?
              Originally posted by MatrixTransform
              where were you before you put yourself last?
              Originally posted by TheNarrator
              Everywhere I travel, tiny life. Single-serving sugar, single-serving cream, single pat of butter. The microwave Cordon Bleu hobby kit. Shampoo-conditioner combos, sample-packaged mouthwash, tiny bars of soap. The people I meet on each flight? They're single-serving friends.

              Comment


              • #8
                Rohingya isn't a religious group it's an ethnic group where the majority are Muslim, but others are Hindu.

                In Burma they have acknowledged 135 ethnic groups in 8 groups. These groups hold citizenship.

                Further to that you have Burmese Chinese, Panthay, Burmese Indians which hold citizenship.

                Then you have Tibetan people, Anglo-Burmese (Eurasians of mixed Burmese and European—though not necessarily British—ancestry), Burmese Gurkha, Burmese Pakistani, Rohingya people, that don't hold citizen, despite many having been there for a long time, like the Rohingya.

                There is of course a lot of nonsense in this. There is no such thing as Pakistani ethnicity. Pakistan is a country made up country from the separation of India (which itself was made from unifications under British Raj). Pakistani's are a collection of Indian ethnic groups that mostly but not all have rejected the caste system and adopted Islam as their religion.

                Sunni Islam has been adopted because that's the version they were exposed to. The majority don't even know or care about the history of the division of Islam (a right of succession issue with Sunni's wanting a political caliphate leaders and shi ites wanting a theological hereditary leader of the line of the Prophet), Islamists are a group of Sunni's grown in the mess of destroyed Iraq and Baathism. Baathism was a pan Arabic socialist movement to create a unification of Arab states, Islamism is the same thing but under Sunni Islam. It became a pan-Islamic invitation because it doesn't have have the numbers to win against ethnic and regional Arabs who basically don't want their shit. Sunni Muslims are amongst those who don't want a caliphate too, they basically want a democracy with Sunni Islam as the state religion. The same deal that Christian European nations and the US had.

                To divide this things into blah religion or blah followers are the evil variant is just nonsense, even the ethnic divisions are largely baloney.

                The simplification is simple, you can see it in disintegrated Iraq, Burma etc. These are intensely discriminatory racist places, where religious unity is a step up. In other words you can get someone to stop attacking because the shade of your skin is different if adopt the same religion.

                Of course that never fixes anything, groups still singled out on the same old basis: taking their stuff.

                What's happened in Burma?

                Once again simple, Aung San Suu Kyi, wants stuff for her group which she prioritises as the most worthy and needful, decides to take minority groups stuff (land). The convenience of the war on terror with all it's baloney identification of who is evil, provides a nice cover to say They are terrists... get em... That way the West goes ohh terrible situation you go girl! It slowly comes out she is a lying piece politician crap. The West then goes... derp, gone dunnit again but she's a feminist icon... awkward, and prevaricates.

                In the meantime 100's of 1000s are getting displaced and looking to other allegiances (like religion) to help them and offer refuge, maybe even somewhere to settle. And guess what that ain't gonna work out so well, because it's not like there are vast areas of free land. So that goes the same old route, you become fighters for us and we'll create a country for ourselves!!! They argue to the new desperate, dispossessed, stateless people; after all we are all in the same boat, we've all been majorly shit on (all the different reasons don't matter when you need force of numbers).

                And the shit just gets worse, even more tangled up and even more entrenched in racism, bigotry, hatred and injustice. But so tangled up that you'll never actually get a war that would sort it out. You'll just get shit that perpetuates, all because some tossers wanted to take other peoples stuff.

                In many ways I'm still center left, but dang it's pretty bloody obvious that if someone wants other peoples stuff... they should offer a fair market price and take no for an answer, they can always make another offer.
                "...especially when it comes to communication, it can be observed, if it is not a negotiation it's a war."
                Originally posted by menrppl2
                Can't live with em, life is great without them.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by TheNarrator View Post
                  you must not know him!
                  haha


                  but in all seriousness. blue has a point why is everyone outraged.. but not outraged at muslims doing the same ? i dont mean that bad deserves bad

                  but.. where was all this moral outrage when muslims were doing the same?

                  should the demonization not go both ways at least?
                  Yes it should, it should go all the ways it happens. The reason you don't get universal outrage at Muslims, is because that's fucking stupid, it's like universal outrage at christians or catholics being held responsible for something protestants or greek orthodox do.

                  You want sanity in this look at who is gaining and who is losing. A lot of the people who fail to speak out clearly about Islamist terrorism do so because they don't like the ISIS strategy of eliminating the grey area, they are not all feminist idiots. They have a different view on dangers of the problem.

                  Feminist idiots support Islamist terrorism for a much more simpler reason. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Islamist terrorists want to kill white people, the feminist nutters think that should be white men (their enemy whom they want to see dispossessed and even killed) therefore align with them. That's the sickening little alignment that we should be calling out. But that won't bother feminists they love the idea of non-white men killing white men, however it might bother whoever is left in the West with half a brain.
                  "...especially when it comes to communication, it can be observed, if it is not a negotiation it's a war."
                  Originally posted by menrppl2
                  Can't live with em, life is great without them.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Anonymous View Post
                    Guilt by association? I expected more from you blue.
                    Exactly. There's enough of a pattern in that religion's history to know with fair certainty that if they were the majority religion in that country, all others would be persecuted. Fuck them.

                    Originally posted by voidspawn View Post
                    Yes it should, it should go all the ways it happens. The reason you don't get universal outrage at Muslims, is because that's fucking stupid, it's like universal outrage at christians or catholics being held responsible for something protestants or greek orthodox do.
                    I'm with Russia: Shia's alright, bomb the fuck out of Sunnis. Iran, 90% Shia, officially recognizes and protects minority religions inside its borders. Fuck Sunnis...who gives a shit.
                    Last edited by oldblueeyes; 09-20-2017, 01:19 PM.
                    Stay single and prosper!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
                      I'm with Russia: Shia's alright, bomb the fuck out of Sunnis. Iran, 90% Shia, officially recognizes and protects minority religions inside its borders. Fuck Sunnis...who gives a shit.
                      87-90% of all Muslims are Sunnis, that's ALL from a religion of more than 1.5 billion people, that's around 20% of the entire planet's population are Sunni Muslims. If you choose to use this foolish way of dividing dangerous fanatics from entirely peaceful followers of a religion... You are going to get precisely no where. Sorry but that many people can replace themselves faster than you could bomb them. And if a madman was was try to use nukes... ha.. good luck trying to get them in one place, you'd have to nuke the entire planet.

                      Naturally of course the vast majority of the planet are going side against anyone or anything who chooses to go against 20% of the worlds population. It's a no brainer, you have this pretty much insignificant number of people who want to kill 20% of the worlds population, answer kill those idiots instead. Problem solved.

                      Now since we are talking countries who have official recognition of and protection of other groups as the criteria. Indonesia (largest Muslim nation of the planet) and Pakistan (second largest) and both majority Sunni, both with internationally accepted tolerance of other religions as their official stance.

                      Your points are ridiculous, but I hope your appreciation of statistics is demonstrated by your willingness to use them. Sorry no automatic religious intolerance or persecution in Sunni countries. Mostly because it's actually against their religion - haram, kaffar and infidel refer to non believers in God, not believers in God who use a different religion.

                      There is a big problem to be solved, being bewilderingly wrong isn't the way to solve it. Seriously follow your position of not giving a shit, then at least you leave the problem to be solved by people who stand a chance and will look at it realistically.
                      "...especially when it comes to communication, it can be observed, if it is not a negotiation it's a war."
                      Originally posted by menrppl2
                      Can't live with em, life is great without them.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
                        Exactly. There's enough of a pattern in that religion's history to know with fair certainty that if they were the majority religion in that country, all others would be persecuted. Fuck them.



                        I'm with Russia: Shia's alright, bomb the fuck out of Sunnis. Iran, 90% Shia, officially recognizes and protects minority religions inside its borders. Fuck Sunnis...who gives a shit.
                        You know that there are several Muslim majority countries in Balkans and minority groups aren´t any worse off then the muslim population (which is not very good but well...) you can´t go judging people based on what other people of the same religion did, yes it sucks most muslim countries are racist and stuff, yes it sucks when muslim minorities get persecuted, one does not preclude the other.
                        I sexually identify as a sword pommel, check your privilege or i will have to end you RIGHTLY.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't care if I sound ridiculous or not. Shut down our borders and keep their shit out of the West. I don't care how many there are in the world, just as long as they stay in their own shithole parts of the world.
                          Stay single and prosper!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
                            I don't care if I sound ridiculous or not. Shut down our borders and keep their shit out of the West. I don't care how many there are in the world, just as long as they stay in their own shithole parts of the world.
                            Our reasoning may not be the same, but it would seem the same basic common sense then can be shared by both of us, that they not be chased out from their parts of the world, like this racist feminist leader of Burma is doing.

                            For whatever warped excuses get applied, every last thing that goes wrong on this planet ends up the West's fault that means Western men's fault. Specifically western white men to take the blame for and surrender what they've earned to be wasted on problems they didn't cause, but still end up resulting in a call for them to be stripped of their place in this world.
                            "...especially when it comes to communication, it can be observed, if it is not a negotiation it's a war."
                            Originally posted by menrppl2
                            Can't live with em, life is great without them.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by oldblueeyes View Post
                              I don't care if I sound ridiculous or not. Shut down our borders and keep their shit out of the West. I don't care how many there are in the world, just as long as they stay in their own shithole parts of the world.
                              cant do this anymore

                              there are already too many in the west. they will outnumber us soon-ish

                              their birth rate > our birth rate.
                              Originally posted by MatrixTransform
                              where were you before you put yourself last?
                              Originally posted by TheNarrator
                              Everywhere I travel, tiny life. Single-serving sugar, single-serving cream, single pat of butter. The microwave Cordon Bleu hobby kit. Shampoo-conditioner combos, sample-packaged mouthwash, tiny bars of soap. The people I meet on each flight? They're single-serving friends.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X