Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

French school rape case: unprecedented DNA tests for all male teachers and students

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • French school rape case: unprecedented DNA tests for all male teachers and students

    Police in France have started DNA testing all male teachers, students and staff in an effort to identify the person responsible for a rape that occurred on school grounds.

    The prosecutor, Isabelle Pagenelle, said “We must have the consent of both the parents and the minor, but those who say no will become potential suspects who could be taken into custody.” On what fucking evidence? Being male?

    So it's basically give up your civil rights or be arrested. I guess they don't believe in reasonable cause, unless being male is reasonable cause enough.

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/french-s...415-zqutz.html

  • #2
    And they banned DNA testing for paternity.

    Now I know why the French liking Jerry Lewis meme is a thing. I'm running out of ways to say it. They. Are. Fucking. Idiots.


    I hope the bureaucrats chock on their escargot.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Usagi Yojimbo View Post
      And they banned DNA testing for paternity.

      Now I know why the French liking Jerry Lewis meme is a thing. I'm running out of ways to say it. They. Are. Fucking. Idiots.


      I hope the bureaucrats chock on their escargot.
      sadly that's what happens when you kill off the vast majority of your able-bodied males in one go... whats left over does nasty things to the quality of your gene pool.
      "It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal." - Aristotle

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes disgusting double standard with the paternity testing.

        What's next, will all males be seen as the enemy and be forced to give out DNA tests and fingerprints when they enter adulthood? Fucking disgraceful violation of human rights and outright sexism and discrimination.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Jack H. View Post
          sadly that's what happens when you kill off the vast majority of your able-bodied males in one go... whats left over does nasty things to the quality of your gene pool.
          The complete military history of France:
          - Gallic Wars
          - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian. [Or at ths time in history, a Roman -ed.]

          - Hundred Years War
          - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.

          - Italian Wars
          - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.

          - Wars of Religion
          - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

          - Thirty Years War
          - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.

          - War of Revolution
          - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

          - The Dutch War
          - Tied

          - War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
          - Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.

          - War of the Spanish Succession
          - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.

          - American Revolution
          - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

          - French Revolution
          - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.

          - The Napoleonic Wars
          - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.

          - The Franco-Prussian War
          - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.

          - World War I
          - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States [Entering the war late -ed.]. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.

          - World War II
          - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

          - War in Indochina
          - Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu

          - Algerian Rebellion
          - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

          - War on Terrorism
          - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.

          The question for any country silly enough to count on the French should not be "Can we count on the French?", but rather "How long until France collapses?"

          "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."

          Or, better still, the quote from last week's Wall Street Journal: "They're there when they need you."

          With only an hour and a half of research, Jonathan Duczkowski provided the following losses:

          Norse invasions, 841-911.
          After having their way with the French for 70 years, the Norse are bribed by a French King named Charles the Simple (really!) who gave them Normandy in return for peace. Normans proceed to become just about the only positive military bonus in France's [favour] for next 500 years.

          Andrew Ouellette posts this in response:

          1066 A.D. William The Conquerer Duke and Ruler of France Launches the Largest Invasion in the history of the world no other was as large until the same trip was taken in reverse on June 6th 1944 William Fights Harold for the Throne of England Which old king Edward rightfully left to William but Harold Usurped the throne Will fights the Saxons (English)wins and the French Rule England for the Next 80 Years. then the French start the largest building and economic infrastructure since the fall of the Roman Empire the Norman Economy skyrockets and the Normans inadvertantly start England to become a major world Power Vive La France-

          Matt Davis posts this in response to Andrew Ouellette above:

          Oh dear. We seem to have overlooked some basic facts. Firstly, Philip the First (1060 - 1108) was King of France at the time of the Norman invasion of 1066 - William was Duke of Normandy and, incidentally, directly descended from the Vikings. William was, therefore, as alien to France as the experience of victory. Since Philip did not invade England, the victory at Hastings was Norman - not French. Normandy may be a part of France now but it most certainly wasn't in 1066. Therefore, William's coronation as King of England had nothing whatsoever to do with the French. As usual, they were nowhere near the place when the fighting was going on. The mistaken belief that 1066 was a French victory leads to the Third Rule of French Warfare; "When incapable of any victory whatsoever - claim someone else's".

          Mexico, 1863-1864.
          France attempts to take advantage of Mexico's weakness following its thorough thrashing by the U.S. 20 years earlier ("Halls of Montezuma"). Not surprisingly, the only unit to distinguish itself is the French Foreign Legion (consisting of, by definition, non-Frenchmen). Booted out of the country a little over a year after arrival.

          Panama jungles 1881-1890.
          No one but nature to fight, France still loses; canal is eventually built by the U.S. 1904-1914.

          Napoleonic Wars.
          Should be noted that the Grand Armee was largely (~%50) composed of non-Frenchmen after 1804 or so. Mainly disgruntled minorities and anti-monarchists. Not surprisingly, these performed better than the French on many occasions.

          Haiti, 1791-1804.
          French defeated by rebellion after sacrificing 4,000 Poles to yellow fever. Shows another rule of French warfare; when in doubt, send an ally.

          India, 1673-1813.
          British were far more charming than French, ended up victors. Therefore the British are well known for their tea, and the French for their whine (er, wine...). Ensures 200 years of bad teeth in England.

          Barbary Wars, middle ages-1830.
          Pirates in North Africa continually harass European shipping in Meditteranean. France's solution: pay them to leave us alone. America's solution: kick their asses ("the Shores of Tripoli"). [America's] first overseas victories, won 1801-1815.

          1798-1801, Quasi-War with U.S.
          French privateers (semi-legal pirates) attack U.S. shipping. U.S. fights France at sea for 3 years; French eventually cave; sets precedent for next 200 years of Franco-American relations.

          Moors in Spain, late 700s-early 800s.
          Even with Charlemagne leading them against an enemy living in a hostile land, French are unable to make much progress. Hide behind Pyrennes until the modern day.

          French-on-French losses (probably should be counted as victories too, just to be fair):

          1208: Albigenses Crusade, French massacared by French.
          When asked how to differentiate a heretic from the faithful, response was "Kill them all. God will know His own." Lesson: French are badasses when fighting unarmed men, women and children.

          St. Bartholomew Day Massacre, August 24, 1572.
          Once again, French-on-French slaughter.

          Third Crusade.
          Philip Augustus of France throws hissy-fit, leaves Crusade for Richard the Lion Heart to finish.

          Seventh Crusade.
          St. Louis of France leads Crusade to Egypt. Resoundingly crushed.

          [Eighth] Crusade.
          St. Louis back in action, this time in Tunis. See Seventh Crusade.

          Also should be noted that France attempted to hide behind the Maginot line, sticking their head in the sand and pretending that the Germans would enter France that way. By doing so, the Germans would have been breaking with their traditional route of invading France, entering through Belgium (Napoleonic Wars, Franco-Prussian War, World War I, etc.). French ignored this though, and put all their effort into these defenses.

          Thomas Whiteley has submitted this addition to me:

          Seven year War 1756-1763
          Lost: after getting hammered by Frederick the Great of Prussia (yep, the Germans again) at Rossbach, the French were held off for the remainder of the War by Frederick of Brunswick and a hodge-podge army including some Brits. War also saw France kicked out of Canada (Wolfe at Quebec) and India (Clive at Plassey).

          Richard Mann, an American in France wants to add the following:

          The French consider the departure of the French from Algeria in 1962-63, after 130 years on colonialism, as a French victory and especially consider C. de Gaulle as a hero for 'leading' said victory over the unwilling French public who were very much against the departure. This ended their colonialism. About 2 million ungrateful Algerians lost their lives in this shoddy affair.
          The ancient shitposter returns.

          Comment


          • #6
            Heh. Ah the French love of losing wars....or hiding till the dust settles and then hosting the victory flag.

            The red and blue on all French flags should, by law, be stuck on with Velcro so as to more easily facilitate retrofit to their default white flag.

            But I digress. It's fun to poke fun at the frogs from time to time.
            Did you leave it better than you found it?

            Comment


            • #7
              The only reason the French are so proud of being lovers, not fighters, is that it's the only option they have a chance of success with. Only now it looks like they're losing that war on all fronts too.
              Last edited by Nateyj11; 04-15-2014, 12:12 PM.
              Disillusionment: Another word for reality.

              Comment


              • #8
                One person is the victim of a crime, the biggest criminal organization in France uses this as an excuse to commit multiple crimes against multiple people.

                Why do you need freedom if you are innocent anyway? Only criminals want to be able to travel undetected. Submit to curfew or be arrested.

                The party is always right, comrades.
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_sY2rjxq6M

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by crash View Post
                  Police in France have started DNA testing all male teachers, students and staff in an effort to identify the person responsible for a rape that occurred on school grounds.

                  The prosecutor, Isabelle Pagenelle, said “We must have the consent of both the parents and the minor, but those who say no will become potential suspects who could be taken into custody.” On what fucking evidence? Being male?

                  So it's basically give up your civil rights or be arrested. I guess they don't believe in reasonable cause, unless being male is reasonable cause enough.

                  http://www.smh.com.au/world/french-s...415-zqutz.html
                  Outrageous of course. But then again it is France,

                  I admit I know nothing about the french legal system but I have heard their legal protections for the accused are much weakers than rights of the accused in the US and other countries.

                  Of course if the misandrists have their way such orwellian tactics could spread and be applied in other nations. Something to be vigilant about.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Nateyj11 View Post
                    The only reason the French are so proud of being lovers, not fighters, is that it's the only option they have a chance of success with. Only now it looks like they're losing that war on all fronts too.
                    Yes their history of fighting is rather embarrassing. Perhaps that explains this iron fisted approach to law and order.

                    Perhaps the solution is the somewhat overdue regularly scheduled excercise conducted by the German Army called " lets invade france".

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by OldNavy View Post
                      Heh. Ah the French love of losing wars....or hiding till the dust settles and then hosting the victory flag.

                      The red and blue on all French flags should, by law, be stuck on with Velcro so as to more easily facilitate retrofit to their default white flag.

                      But I digress. It's fun to poke fun at the frogs from time to time.

                      Love this joke, any time I get into an argument with a Frenchmen I drop this one.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Nateyj11 View Post
                        The only reason the French are so proud of being lovers, not fighters, is that it's the only option they have a chance of success with. Only now it looks like they're losing that war on all fronts too.
                        Actually, they are losing that fight, too. The Native French (i.e. of Gallic ancestry,) are on a losing battle with negative population growth for years. Not to much loving going on if there aren't enough babies to meet replacement rates.

                        They are going to lose themselves out of existence.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Happy to see frogs and their misandrist culture bred out of existance.

                          Just fucking tap out already.

                          That goes double for Sweden.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It was sad today, my French Toast surrendered to my Wurst.
                            https://christianrestoration.wordpress.com/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              These women are going to completely destroy western culture and see it conquered by something much more misogynistic.
                              "Women are like that they dont acquire knowledge of people we are for that they are just born with a practical fertility of suspicion that makes a crop every so often and usually right they have an affinity for evil for supplying whatever the evil lacks in itself for drawing it about them instinctively as you do bed-clothing in slumber fertilising the mind for it until the evil has served its purpose whether it ever existed or no" - William Faulkner

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X