Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"We must educate our sons to save our daughters "

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "We must educate our sons to save our daughters "

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...s-9588177.html



    ....

  • #2
    No! We Don't!!!

    We must educate our daughters, to save our sons!!!!!!!!!!!
    RWBY is Legend. Honey Badgers

    Women Against Feminism.

    Logic trumps ignorance, but emotion retards edification.

    Comment


    • #3
      We must educate everyone to save themselves.
      "Not all with tits are twisted." -Me

      Comment


      • #4
        I notice pretty much every comment is ripping into her, I think people like her will kill labours chance of winning in an election so thankfully bigoted pieces like that will ensure that less people vote for those warmongering fhemorrhoids again.
        "Claiming a movement called 'Feminism' is about sexual equality is like claiming a movement called 'Aryanism' is about racial equality."
        Realsexism.com - Real Sexism is against Men

        Comment


        • #5
          I watched this last night. The attack on boys in the UK is MUCH worse than you think:


          This is about as feminist as it can get, it even promotes Laci Green as a sex educator! The thumbs up to down ratio is tragic. Far too many people fell for this shit.
          White privilege is just like 'the patriarchy' for minorities!
          Womyn, to take the man out of woman, too stupid to know Y it's a bad idea

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't get this article at all. It's a very poorly-phrased headline, to start. Did it intend to use a comma? If not, then why isn't the article about ways to educate boys?

            Compare:

            1. We must educate our sons to save our daughters.
            2. We must educate our sons, to save our daughters.

            Analysis:

            1. The goal is teaching boys that girls need saving.
            2. The goal is saving girls, which can be achieved by educating boys.

            In the first, it would be promoting white knight culture. Girls are always helpless victims and boys need a sense of chivalry.
            In the second, if boys are preoccupied with science, math, history, politics, art, & etc., they won't have time to hurt the girls.

            Neither one is particularly productive, and the article doesn't make it clear which of the goals is intended.

            Comment


            • #7
              We can't ignore the way young people’s perceptions of sex and the interaction between men and women are being shaped by online access to extreme and violent porn.
              Evidence? ...Of course, you don't need evidence if you're a woman, MP or if it might harm your stance on a particular political subject.

              Now I'm all for things like ending revenge porn, what moderate wouldn't be? But, when it is couched in this particular language I worry because it is so horribly anti-male in it's outlook.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kursal View Post
                Evidence? ...Of course, you don't need evidence if you're a woman, MP or if it might harm your stance on a particular political subject.

                Now I'm all for things like ending revenge porn, what moderate wouldn't be? But, when it is couched in this particular language I worry because it is so horribly anti-male in it's outlook.
                I'm pretty moderate, but I don't want these anti-porn laws, even so called "revenge porn". The ability to abuse such a law about posting pics of your ex far outweighs any benefit society may gain. Example: Husband and wife make homemade porn, post it to the internet. Wife bores of husband and divorces him and uses the porn that he can't possibly prove that he had her consent when he uploaded it, to gain a favorable divorce outcome and child custody. Who gets to decide what is 'porn'? Is a pic in a racy swimsuit 'porn'? This is a bad route to travel.

                Chris
                White privilege is just like 'the patriarchy' for minorities!
                Womyn, to take the man out of woman, too stupid to know Y it's a bad idea

                Comment


                • #9
                  “heckled if they dare to speak in class, their shirts forcibly undone, their skirts lifted and held by groups of boys”.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Sadly men are nothing if not accommodating the more we tell boys they are violent sex maniacs the more they will grow to fill that role which society has made for them, we are all about filling holes you know.
                    the more we vilify and demonize their sexuality, the more they will seek to simply fulfill their needs with as much regard for their partners emotional well being as has been shown towards theirs.
                    "It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal." - Aristotle

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      a brainwashing session ; the younger it starts the more ingrained it becomes

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So despite feminists gaining control and dictating the narrative of schools, Parliament, employment and the media, things have got worse. And her solution is MORE feminism? Riiiiight.
                        Gender is a grammatical distinction and applies to words only. Sex is natural distinction and applies to living objects.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          We are fucking doomed. Poor, poor boys. I feel so bad for them. So young and already getting abused by feminazism... I wish there was a way to save them... This world is going down the fucking drain...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by KikiSpaghetti View Post
                            We must educate everyone to save themselves.
                            QFT.

                            Thank you!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Zuberi View Post
                              Yeah, that was as far as I read because the bullshit meter was off the charts.

                              I consider myself far from a white knight, but if I were witness to such behaviour in high school I would likely have resorted to violence against the perpetrator if authority refused to do something about it. Of course, the idea that the teachers or administration would let something like that occur unpunished is ludicrous to me. I remember when I was a little boy of 6 or 7 years there was a girl I teased in typical ways like calling her names and throwing paper planes at her head and a teacher shouted at me, telling me that that was sexual harassment.

                              To be sure, that teacher was nothing more than a hate filled feminist bitch, but without meaning to she did help me. It's good for a boy to learn very early on that it's dangerous to interact with girls.
                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_sY2rjxq6M

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X